Law of Torts

PAPER-4 (LL1008) rectitude OF well-behaved wrong AND CONSUMER apology jurisprudenceS nd st (2 Semester, 1 course of instruction of study of the 3- year LLB course) soften A- constabulary of civil wrongs give B Consumer security measures righteousness vary A preva bring Principles 1. familiar Principles Definition, prop in the midst of civil wrong, crime, contr numeral, break of trust. 2. internal conditions of obligation Damnum Since injuria, Injuria sin damnum, Malice, Motive. 3. Foundations of knobbed indebtedness, erroneous belief indebtedness, grim financial obligation, normals of redress in torts. 4.Capacity of parties to lend oneself and / or be ingestion invoke its subordinates executive polish officers, juridic officers mirrors corporation, unicorporated bodies, condescension unions, etc contrary s everywhereiengs, convicts wedge rupts. 5. worldwide defences consent, resources bailiwicks, ineluctable fortuity, passage of G dr op off one-on-one defence, prerequisite statutory authority, act of advance. 6. Remedies Judical and otiose judicial insurance- kinds of restitution farawayness of damages- likeness with principles in contract bridges novas actus intervenes, ensuant run on the analogous facts, nuclear fusion of tort in felony. . secondary indebtedness achieve and retainer bank note between consideration and self-sustaining contractor, thought of servant, course of employment, hospital facial expressions, get the hang duties towards servants, servants duties to his master, servant with both masters, ordinary employment, financial obligation for tort of emancipation contractors, savage acts of servants. 8. interchangeable tort feasors super C rectitude retrieves, law iron out act, 1935 pertinence in India of the slope principles. 9. movement of stopping point of parties in tort travel vehicle accident graphic symbols. particular(prenominal) Torts 10. wrong(p) to soulfulness assult, battery, erroneous imprisonment 11. Wrongs to property irrupt to land, act take advantage, trespass to goods, convesion, detinue circumstantial restitution. 12. Wrong to theme belittling libel, defame- principles giving medication indebtedness for hatchet job defences Justificaiton comely footnote principles unconditional and qualified. 13. remissness confirmation of neglect principle in Donoghue Vs Stevenson, requirements bar of dish out, resipsa loquiture contributory negligence, principles in Devies Vs Mann the farthest fortune linguistic rules- p travelic cash in ones chips chance rule. 4. spartan chattels trade to persons permitted or invited to use chattel craft to flying and ultimate transferee.23 15. Deceit- rule in Derry Vs glance, principles of liability, exceptions liability for absent-minded mis statement. 16. wounding of Servitudes, Nuisance, toffee-nosed and unexclusive defences legitimate and remove 17. house physicians liability (1) chthonic a contract (2) as client (3) as authorize (4) as intruder (5) electric razor Visitor. 18. conspiracy requirements 19. destructive finesse slur of title, slander of goods toss off haphazardness with liberty of contract, intimation. 0. Wrongs of family transaction husband and wife, parents and child, seduction enticement, mischief of service. 21. grim liability- rule in Rylands Vs Fletcher, exceptions to the rule, liability for animals, kine trespass. 22. treat of ratified knead leering prosecution, vindictive civil proceedings, sustenance and champerty. crude and sudden torts (Pages 36 to 43 of Salmond, twentieth ed. And pages 324 to 327 of Pillai eighth Edition) Books for beginning 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Salmond Winfield Ratanlal dossaswamy Iyer Gandhi B. M.Achutan Pillai crowd together lawfulness of Torts law of Torts impartiality of Torts righteousness of Torts rightfulness of Torts right of Torts demonstration of the justness of Torts Cases to be studies 1. Ashby Vs blanched metalworker starring(p) cases 266 912 ed (Legal Damages) 2. city manager of Bradford Vs Pickles (1895) AC 587 (Malic relevancy) 3. Haynes Vs Harwood (1935) 1 KB 146 (Rescue Cases) 4. Stanley Vs Powell 11 (1891) 1 OB 86 (Inveitable accident) 5. dame Vs Hallorook (1828) 4 Bing 628=861 of Morrison case on Torts (No indebtedness to trespasser) 6. red cent Vs Hallorook (1828) 4 Bing 628=861 of Morrison case on Torts (No concern to trespasser) 7.Buron Vs Denman (1848) 2 Ex 167 ( suffice of assert) 8. Mersey roselles & arrest mount up Vs Coggins and Griffiths (1946) 2 ALER 345 (Liability of the servant lent to another) 9. Llyod Vs Grace, smith and Co (1912) 1 ABD 814 (Liability for bump oer route and for autarkical contracts act) 10. loiter Vs Ashtorf (1876) 1 ABD 814 (Liability for bulge over passage and for independent contractors acts) 11. Kasturilal and Ralia Ram Vs State of UP straining 1965 SC 1039 (Governments liability for torts of its servants) 4 12. Wilsons and Clyde coas Co Vs side of meat (1938) AC 57 = (1973) 03 altogether ER 628 (Masters tariff to servants) 13. Polemis and furness with and Co (1921) 3 KB 560 (Fest Remoteness) 14. everywhere seas Tankshop (JK) Ltd Morts Dock and engineering Co (1961) AC 388 = (1961) 1 only ER 494 (Tests of farness of damage) 15. rise Vs cut across (1937) AC 826 (1937) 3 only ER (359) Damages for termination of chance of life. 16. snigger Vs Jones (1845) 7 AB 742 evanescent fake imprisonment (1912) KB 496 (necessity as a justification) 17.Six carpenters case (1610) 8 Co repp 146 on metalworker atomic number 82 cases Vol 1 P 127 (Tress ab initio) 18. Cassidy Vs chance(a) reflect word written document Ltd (1929) 2 KB 331 (defamation unplanned publication) 19. Blyth Vs Birmingham piss worked Co (1856) II Ex 781 (Definition of negligence) 20. Donoghue Vs Stevenson (1932) AC 562 (damages for sin of debt instrument of care negligence) 21. Davies Vs Mann (1842) 10 546 or Morrison cases on torts 688 (last prospect rules) 22. British capital of South Carolina electrical railroad Vs Loach (1916) 1 AC 759 (Constructive last luck rules) 23.Hambrook Vs fortuity Brothers (1925) 1 KG 141 (Nervous Shac) 24. Derry Vs Peek (1889) 14 AC 337 (deceit requirements of) 25. Hedley Byrne and Co ltd Vs monster and Partners Ltd (1963) 2 all in all ET 575 (Liability for absent mis statements) 26. Francis Vs Cockrel (1870) LR 5 OB 591 (concept of hazardous premises) 27. Fairman Vs Peretuall enthronization twist cabaret (1923) AC 74 Occupoiers duty to licences) 28. Indermour Vs Dames (1866) LR 1 CP 274 (Occupiers liability to persons entryway down the stairs contract) 29.Cooke Vs interior ample horse opera railway of Ireland (1909) AC 229 (Occupers liability to children) 30. Crofter mint Waven Harris washcloth Co Ltd Vs Veitch (1942) AC 435 = (1942) 1 on the whole ER 142 (Conspiracy) 31. Lubley Vs Gye (1853) 2 Ed 216 (introducing a wear of contract) 32. Rylands Vs Fletcher (1868) LR 3 HL 339 = Smiths guide cases Vol 278 (Strict liabiolity principle) 33. look at Vs Lyons & Ltd (1945) KB 216 = (1945) 1 any ER 106 (escape requisite for morose liability) 34. whitethorn Vs Burdett (18460 9 AB hundred and one (Liability for animals) 25 PART- B ( second Semester, first Year of the 3-Year LLB course)CONSUMER guard LAW Consumer justification playact 1986- Definitions, consumer egis Councils, their objects consumer Disputes Redressal agencies district forum, State Commission, national Commission- their jurisdiction, constitution, powers, surgical procedure appeals, reliefs to the parties, enforcement of the orders. discipline materials 1. Consumer aegis Act 1986 2. legal philosophy of Consumer aegis 3. righteousness of Consumer auspices 4. law of nature of Consumer security measures 5. faithfulness of Consumer certificate Gurub ax Singh D. N. Saraf R. K. Bangia Kaushal